Hazem Naow vs Moritz Hoffmann Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Oct at 02:36 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
H. Naow vs M. Hoffmann

SYR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Naow 1 - 0 Hoffmann
They have played 2 sets in total, with Hazem Naow winning 2 and Moritz Hoffmann winning 0. The last match between Hazem Naow and Moritz Hoffmann was at the M15 Offenbach, 14-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Hazem Naow getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Naow | 1 |
| Hoffmann | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Offenbach(10-14-25)
H. Naow vs M. Hoffmann H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 63.31% (176-102) | Career Total W/L | 48.10% (38-41) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
H. Naow vs M. Hoffmann Match Preview:
- In terms of second serve performance, Moritz Hoffmann has an advantage, winning 46.45% of points compared to Hazem Naow's 37.74%.
- Return game stats favor Hazem Naow, as he wins 56.60% of opponents' second serve points, while Hoffmann wins 45.38%.
- For first serve returns, Naow again performs better, achieving a 32.66% win rate versus Hoffmann's 23.93%.
- Under pressure, Hoffmann edges out by saving 52.63% of breakpoints, compared to Naow's 48.91%.
- Over the last year, Hoffmann has a moderately higher match win percentage at 52.08% compared to Naow's 46.67%.
- Both players have their best career surface win percentage on Hard courts, at 69% for both; however, Naow performs better on Clay.
- With regard to event participation, Naow has a slightly better win rate in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at 55.56% compared to Hoffmann's 52.08%.
- When it comes to opponent quality, Hoffmann has faced more highly-ranked players, with an average rank of 141.9, in contrast to Naow's 283.
- If the match proceeds to a deciding set, Naow holds a significant advantage, winning 50% of such sets versus Hoffmann’s 18%.
- Current event stats and specific event performance could also play a role in the final outcome, especially if either player is on a streak.
Editorial Prediction (October 14, 2025, UTC):
When evaluating the upcoming match, several key factors stand out. Moritz Hoffmann demonstrates superior second serve and break point resilience, which can be pivotal in close matches. Additionally, his experience against higher-ranked opponents may better prepare him for challenging situations.
However, Hazem Naow's strong return game and capability in deciding sets provide him with a significant edge in turning games in his favor. His performance metrics on both Hard and Clay courts make him a versatile competitor.
While Hoffmann's overall historical performance and break point saves are noteworthy, Naow’s return efficiency and track record in critical match moments suggest a competitive edge in this matchup.
Given these factors, Hazem Naow appears to be the most likely winner of the upcoming tennis match.
Hazem Naow vs Moritz Hoffmann Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
H. Naow vs M. Hoffmann H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:32:0 | Average Match Time | 1:32:0 |
| 65% (33/51) | 1st Serve % | 55% (31/56) |
| 82% (27/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 42% (13/31) |
| 50% (9/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (15/25) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (28/56) | Return Points Win % | 29% (15/51) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
H. Naow Recent Matches Played
M. Hoffmann Recent Matches Played

H. Naow vs M. Hoffmann Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.31% (176/102) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.10% (38/41) |
| 61.30% (388/245) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.14% (90/86) |
| 54.39% (3182/2668) | Games Win/Loss | 51.43% (900/850) |
| 68.42% (78/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 68.75% (11/5) |
| 57.94% (62/45) | Clay Win/Loss | 29.63% (8/19) |
| 63.16% (36/21) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52.78% (19/17) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 409 | Aces Total | 98 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 748 | Total Double Faults | 121 |
| 1:23:18 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 414.8 | Average Opponent Rank | 181.18 |
| 67% (10190/15241) | 1st Serve % | 58% (1303/2266) |
| 65% (6599/10190) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (861/1303) |
| 47% (2389/5051) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (478/963) |
| 46% (851/1865) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (82/181) |
| 44% (6841/15565) | Return Points Win % | 38% (825/2164) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.85% (30/29) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67.13% (145/71) | Futures W/L | 48.10% (38/41) |
| 63% (172/273) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (38/78) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (32/62) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (12/22) |
| 51% (40/78) | Deciding Set Win % | 26% (5/19) |
| 89% (170/152) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (43/36) |
| 11% (170/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (43/7) |
| 22% (108/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (36/2) |